null

WAPTAC Blog


Category Listing
Archived Categories

The WAPTAC Blog Policy

Sort By: Title   |   Blog Date


PY 2011 Weatherization Funding Survey now available



Monday, May 14, 2012

The NASCSP 2011 Program Year (PY 2011) Funding Survey is now available on waptac.org here.

The NASCSP WAP Funding Survey is the only comprehensive measure of all funds, including non-DOE funds, used in the Program. Each year, the survey catalogues the funding and production levels for each Grantee of the Program as well as the source of that funding including the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), utility funds, and state funds among others.

Some highlights from this year include:

  • An estimated $1,088,197,305 will be available to Grantees of the WAP PY 2011 (April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012 for most Grantees and July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012 for other Grantees) in regular DOE, LIHEAP, and Other funds, such as utility funds.
  • A national network of Grantees, local agencies, and private contractors will use these annual grant funds to weatherize an estimated 175,722 low-income homes. 
  • In PY 2011, the WAP will leverage approximately $835,770,559 in federal, Grantee, and private funds, or approximately $3.31 in federal and non-federal resources for every dollar invested by DOE.
  • Grantees may budget a portion DOE funds as “leveraging funds” to be used in initiatives to garner additional funding from sources outside of the traditional network. In 2011, 17 Grantees designated $2,236,685 for this purpose, an increase of $126,501 over 2010, as well as $10,145,630 of Recovery Act funding. When compared with Other funding, this represents a match of 1,0632 percent, which shows that the WAP network leveraging activities have been highly successful.  These figures include all Other funds, such as those from utility companies, State general funds, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, and rehabilitation grants, but do not include LIHEAP funding.

The composition of funds changes over time, the below graph shows how the distribution of DOE, LIHEAP, and Other funds has changed since 2001.

Past year’s funding surveys are also available on waptac.org here.


Posted by: Alice Gaston at 11:47 AM
 | permalink



Energy Out West



Monday, April 30, 2012
The Energy Out West conference is held every other year and began in 1996 when a group of people doing weatherization work in the Northwest thought they could help each other do it better. The current president of Energy Out West (EOW) is Mimi Burbage, who should be familiar to readers of Home Energy and anyone in weatherization. Mimi brings that independent, Alaska, straight talk style to whatever she does, from heading the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation to her work for EOW. This year the conference is in Boise, Idaho, which some people call the Northern Austin and I can see their point. It’s not just about potatoes around here. Good food, good music, and great public art are in abundance.

The core conference began this morning, after coffee and scones, with some introductions and welcome by Carol Gates, from DOE’s Golden Field Office. Carol recounted some of the successes of the last few years and WAP’s part in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009. Here are some brag facts: 

• More than 700,000 homes weatherized that will save $6.6 billion over the life of the measures; or $350 million each year.
• WAP ARRA efforts created the third highest job numbers, at 13,230 as of the 4th quarter of 2011.
• 377 MBtu of energy saved over the life of the measures; or 19 million MBtu per year.

The keynote speaker was Chris Gardner, the real life version of the man the actor Will Smith played in the movie “The Pursuit of Happyness.” He is funny, wise, original, and very memorable. He does a much better job of being himself than Will Smith did. He somehow integrates a very healthy positive self regard, honesty, compassion, and deep humility. Unique and inspirational.

It was a full day and I didn’t come close to taking in everything that was offered. Sue White of American Indian Professional Services, Inc., as she has done for years, talked about the financial side of running a weatherization agency. (She recieved the EOW President's award—see photo.) Thomas Brunet of California American Water put the fear-of-drought in all his listeners. He highlighted Monterey, California for using half as much water as they used only several years ago, through the outreach he did to encourage conservation, and by the city implementing a tiered payment system. The city uses about 2.5 kWh to move a unit of water from the source to the user. Compare that to LA, which uses almost 7 kWh to move the same unit of water. Then Bob Scott of the National Association of State Community Services Providers (NASCSP) depressed us, but not too much, by recounting how poorly the WAP program is being treated by the current dysfunctional Congress. He announced free beer at the reception after his talk, provided by Saturn Resources Management, and promised more hope for tomorrow.

For the original post on homeenergy.org, please click here.

Posted by: Jim Gunshinan at 9:31 AM
 | permalink



DOE Backs Four New Professional Certifications



Monday, April 16, 2012
Four new weatherization and home energy professional certifications will be introduced in June by the Building Performance Institute, Inc. (BPI). These voluntary certifications cover the most common job classifications in the weatherization and home energy upgrade industry: energy auditor, retrofit installer, crew leader, and quality control inspector.

BPI will pilot written and field practical exams in June. Registration for these exams is now open online at www.bpi.org/pilot. Scheduling of pilot exams will begin in May. Eight hundred people are sought for the initial testing.

The results of the pilot test cycle will be used to set passing scores for the national exams. Candidates who take the initial exams and meet passing requirements will be among the first group of professionals to earn these certifications. In the fall, BPI expects to give the exams across the country.

"The emphasis is on field experience—being able to demonstrate practical ability to do the job. It's not about taking a class and taking a test. It's a demonstration of experience and the quality of work," says Josh Olsen, policy adviser for the Weatherization Assistance Program, U.S. Department of Energy.

The new credentials will meet the International Organization for Standardization's (ISO) 17024 standard, which is the international benchmark for personnel certifications across all industries. Under ISO 17024, each new certification is developed and administered using international best practices, such as cross-disciplinary peer review and industry validation of technical materials.

The U.S. Department of Energy and its National Renewable Energy Laboratory developed the framework for these certifications in partnership with the Weatherization Assistance Program. They will not replace or interfere with professional certifications in the building trades. They are intended to support the four most common whole-house home performance job roles.

Posted by: Sam Daugherty at 11:57 AM
 | permalink



Tips for Starting a Healthy Homes Program



Monday, April 09, 2012
NASCSP’s healthy homes staff has recently completed its Weatherization Plus Health conference swing to six different regions across the country.  A key component of these conferences was a “Promising Practices” panel session, which provided audience members with an opportunity to question presenters on how they got their initiatives off the ground.   Many presenters were able to motivate attendees to begin work on healthy homes initiatives in their communities, convincing them that creating the capacity to expand their reach and the services they offer doesn’t have to be complicated.  Below are some key points for the creation and sustainability of a successful healthy homes program. 

1. Don’t reinvent the wheel:
One of the most common mistakes organizations make when trying to incorporate healthy homes into their programs is trying to do too much too soon.  Organizations have to take a sober look at what is achievable within their means, and aim for those goals first.  By starting small you can get buy in from staff and those responsible for helping implement new program objectives.  Often these small goals include ramping up client education efforts, and coordinating cross training between partner organizations.  These strategies usually result in an extremely efficient way to provide healthy homes interventions.  By creating cost-effective, comprehensive solutions concerning a few small goals, agencies can improve their capacity to take on a bigger workload, and as a result, plant the seed for future grant money. 
  
2. Develop Partnerships:
Relying on the knowledge of partners is the best way to create the capacity needed to more comprehensively address the needs of low-income families.  One organization cannot have the expertise in all areas of healthy homes.  In order for a healthy homes initiative to work, it’s critical that the right people perform the right tasks.  Therefore, it is important to partner with as many organizations as possible, creating an effective referral network that can truly provide a hand up to low-income families. Sharing the workload among partners is critical to maintaining buy in and excitement for new initiatives. 

3. Data Collection:
The most compelling way to argue that your initiative is successful is by proving that you are getting significant bang for your buck.  This requires a data collection/tracking system that can measure homes completed and health improvements.  Many of the presenters said they began tracking data with in-depth questionnaires administered to clients prior to providing services.  After homes were serviced, they would then administer a series of follow up calls to track the level of client health improvements over time.  This allowed presenters make the case that they were in a position to ably manage scarce resources. 

4. Start Now:
Some cuts in funding for weatherization and healthy homes grantees are likely for FY 2012. Those programs who can comprehensively meet the needs of clients with fewer resources will shine the brightest.  Since implementing these initiatives takes time for planning, obtaining buy-in from staff and partners, and developing tools to measure the success of new programs, it is best to go ahead and evaluate what can be achieved now, and work toward obtaining those goals.  Integrating a healthy homes component into State and local weatherization programs will be an effective way for the Weatherization Assistance Program to further prove its adaptability and sophistication.  The time to begin is now.

Posted by: Rebecca Stewart at 3:04 PM
 | permalink



One-Touch: Saving Money and Improving Health Through Collaboration



Monday, April 09, 2012

When resources are scarce, leveraging program dollars through coordination of housing-related programs can improve outcomes for clients and programs alike. This is at the heart of One Touch, a model for collaboration between energy conservation services, healthy homes programs, and housing rehabilitation efforts that is generating early successes around the country.

When the National Center for Healthy Housing launched One Touch with the City of Boston in 2005, targeting the neighborhoods of Dorchester and Roxbury, they focused on:

• Well-known causes of ill health and disability in children,
• Low-cost interventions that offer a big return on investment, and
• Improving efficiency through coordinating services delivery, so that a household has one intake or “touch” rather than many interactions with different agencies.

For Boston children, housing-related health and safety issues such as asthma, lead poisoning, and falls in the home could be addressed through relatively low-cost and effective measures.  These included referrals for smoking cessation for residents, integrated pest management instead of using pesticides, weatherization to improve air sealing and insulation, and addressing moisture build up through ventilation and minor home repairs to fix leaks.

The Boston pilot demonstrates the value of the One Touch approach for clients, agencies, and funders. Lowering high rates of asthma and lead poisoning improves the quality of life and life chances of children, while promising cost savings to the state Medicaid program. Installing energy-saving appliances and conservation measures reduces home energy bills, lessening financial burdens on households and improving indoor air quality at the same time.

A great example of the success of One Touch Boston is 7 Sussex Street, a single family brick rowhouse purchased by an income-eligible family using HUD HOME and private financing. Through the Residential Development Program of the City of Boston’s Department of Neighborhood Development, city program staff and NCHH advisors walked through the development of a rehabilitation work plan, producing a set of specifications that contractors successfully implemented within the budget constraints. Coordination at the point of intake for the housing unit itself –the preparation of a scope of work for rehabilitation –reaped benefits in terms of greater energy efficiency, lower bills, and better health for children. The Boston effort also involved work with the City’s Department of Neighborhood Development to incorporate healthy homes building practices into the City’s rehab specification.

With funding from HUD’s Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Poisoning Prevention and support from the US Department of Agriculture, entities are scaling up and piloting One Touch in three new locations: the city of Manchester, New Hampshire, the counties of Merrimack and Belknap, New Hampshire and Omaha, Nebraska. These locations focus on coordination and referrals during intake, using three new tools and approaches:

1. Short checklists, providing an energy and health checkup, that add 15- 40  minutes to intake (varies by project as checklists are tailored to meet local needs);
2. New client education; and
3. Expanded scope of work for housing repairs.

Both New Hampshire community pilots use One Touch checkup forms for homes visited by WAP or Head Start to determine the opportunities to leverage program services through referrals. The chart below details the needs of homes determined in the initial checkups performed by Merrimack Belknap:

Intervention Need  Number of Units 
WAP  91 units
Asthma  24 units (17 with children, 7 with Adults)
Lead  47 units
Pests  12 units
Moisture  63 units
Smokers  12 units


In addition to agreeing to use the energy and health checkups as part of intake, the New Hampshire pilot partners began to negotiate Memoranda of Understanding among the health, housing, and energy programs to facilitate referrals on behalf of clients at the point of intake. Partners also agreed to expand the scope of repairs permitted under selected programs, for example, adding moisture and integrated pest management interventions to weatherization.

Partners at the Omaha site include a mix of public agencies similar to the New Hampshire and Boston pilots (health, housing, and energy), as well as new public partners (the Omaha Public Power District,  and the DOE Better Buildings project), and nongovernmental organizations including the Healthy Kids Alliance, Habitat for Humanity, and Rebuilding Together. The initial group of 40 homes in Omaha’s One Touch project participate in reEnergize, an energy upgrade funded through an Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (ARRA and local funds). Over the summer of 2011, an expanded group of partners began using the energy and health checkups together with referrals and coordinated services provision. 

Each year in both New Hampshire and Nebraska, public programs that deliver health and energy services help thousands of low-income families. Publicly administered housing renovation and rehabilitation programs benefit hundreds more. Using the One Touch approach to identify areas where coordination and referrals for healthy homes and energy interventions are cost-effective builds working relationships among partners committed to improving housing for low-income families, promising both economies of scale and program sustainability.  

Sources:

  • Kate Kuholski, Ellen Tohn, and Rebecca Morley. Healthy Energy-Efficient Housing: Using a One-Touch Approach to Maximize Public Health, Energy, and Housing Programs and Policies. J Public Health Management Practice, 2010, 16(5) E-Supp, S68–S74.

  • Ellen Tohn (Tohn Environmental), Beverly Drouin (NH DHHS), Ryan Clouthier (Southern NH Services).  “One Touch Healthy & Energy Efficient Housing New Hampshire Pilot,” Unpublished The National Center for Healthy Homes with Peggy Hegarty-Steck, NCHH; Naomi Mermin, Naomi Mermin Consulting;  Ellen Tohn, Tohn Environmental Strategies. “Boston One Touch Action Steps for Healthier and Greener Homes for Boston Families”, (2008). Available at www.nchh.org
  • Presentation, NASCSP Weatherization Plus Health Regional Conference, Portland, ME (May 2011). Available at nascsp.org .
  • Personal Communication with Ellen Tohn, Tohn Environmental Strategies, October 2011.

Posted by: Lynne Snyder at 2:59 PM
 | permalink



Weatherization Plus Health: The Next Step for WAP



Tuesday, March 13, 2012

The connection between health and housing seems clear: we spend most of our time inside our homes, and our surroundings have a great impact on our well-being. What may be less obvious is the connection between health and the home’s energy efficiency. Preventable medical bills, rising energy costs, and wages lost due to illness cost Americans hundreds of millions of dollars a year. Nearly six million households have moderate to severe physical housing problems, placing them at increased risk for illnesses and injuries. On top of that, low-income households are disproportionately affected by high energy bills; these households spend 14% of their income on energy costs, compared with 3.5% for all other households. The lowest of low-income households spend far more than that.

The Weatherization Plus Health initiative, implemented by the National Association for State Community Services Programs (NASCSP) on behalf of DOE, seeks to establish a link between the low-income Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) and healthy-homes programs nationwide, ensuring that homes served by these programs are safer, healthier, and more energy efficient by bridging the gap between these complementary services. I work for NASCSP as the project coordinator for energy services, which supports both WAP and Weatherization Plus Health, assisting in this project.

WAP’s mission is to reduce energy costs for low-income families—particularly for the elderly, people with disabilities, and children—by improving the energy efficiency of their homes while ensuring their health and safety. For many years, innovative service providers have creatively leveraged resources to deliver more comprehensive services than are allowed under DOE WAP regulations. For example, the Bellingham, Washington, Opportunity Council has leveraged a wide variety of resources to bundle services and enable employees to address residents’ specific health problems and provide appropriate health-related home retrofits. (See “Case Study: Opportunity Council of Bellingham, Washington.”)

Another leader is the city of Baltimore, Maryland, which must turn away some weatherization applicants because its housing stock is too degraded. To combat this problem, the city launched several projects to partner with health organizations, create a coordination team, facilitate roof replacements, and digitize files to merge applications and ensure that they are reviewed quickly, helping to coordinate resources and services.

Addressing Health and Safety
WAP already considers health and safety when retrofitting a home; it is a cornerstone of the program and is incorporated into the mission statement cited above. The program’s comprehensive whole-house approach recognizes that a house consists of interdependent parts and that any modification of these parts should take into account the interaction between the occupants’ behavior, the building envelope, and the mechanical systems. Modifications to one part of a house can lead to unforeseen consequences in another.

Health and safety was not a main focus of WAP until the early 1990s, when the use of blower doors and advanced air-sealing techniques became common. As WAP technicians developed their expertise in air sealing, the potential impact of these procedures on indoor air quality (IAQ) became apparent, spurring more emphasis on health and safety issues. Significant air sealing can affect IAQ through moisture, by-products of combustion, air pressure and backdrafting, and airborne chemicals and pollutants. Poorly performed weatherization can exacerbate existing problems or even create new ones. Conversely, properly performed weatherization can solve some problems and create a healthier indoor environment by conducting combustion appliance zone (CAZ) testing and ensuring a proper draft.

Using DOE and other WAP funds, weatherization technicians can usually address health and safety issues related to heating systems, work lead safe, solve some moisture problems, correct minor electrical and plumbing problems, add or repair ventilation, and provide educational material to residents. In fact, WAP has been a leader in instituting the widespread use of these techniques and standardizing processes for low-income homes nationwide. Although this approach has led to the safe weatherization of millions of homes over the 30-year history of the program, the focus on energy efficiency restricts the use of funds to address more extensive, comprehensive remediation and mitigation projects, including those for asbestos, lead, radon, or structural deficiencies. The result is that projects of this kind are often deferred.

This is not likely to change any time soon and it is not likely that its mission will be broadened to include major health and safety projects (see “Evaluating DOE’s Weatherization Assistance Program,” HE, July/Aug ’10, p. 22). Energy savings, and energy savings per dollar invested, will remain the major focus of all the metrics analyzed in the current national WAP evaluation. Health and safety measures cost money but typically provide no energy savings. In order to qualify for WAP funding, health and safety expenditures must meet a stringent criterion—namely, that it is necessary to eliminate the hazard in question before, or as a result of, the installation of weatherization materials. This restriction is reasonable; funds are limited and WAP’s primary mission is to promote energy conservation.

Case Study: Opportunity Council of Bellingham, Washington
What does a WAP and healthy-homes collaboration look like? The following case study will give you a good idea of how it works.
Ms. Jones applied for energy assistance through the Opportunity Council (OC), a private, nonprofit community action agency serving homeless and low-income families and individuals in Island, San Juan, and Whatcom counties in northwest Washington State. The Opportunity Council offers services that range from addressing immediate and crisis-oriented needs (food, emergency shelter, eviction prevention) to long-term programs that promote self-sufficiency in the community (early childhood education, home weatherization). See “Restoring Indoor Health, One House at a Time,” HE, Jan/Feb ’04, p. 24.

During the eligibility appointment, staff asked whether anyone in the household had asthma, allergies, or other respiratory problems. Ms. Jones responded that both she and her daughter had been diagnosed with asthma. After staff explained the OC’s Weatherization Plus Health program to her, Ms. Jones expressed an interest both in the weatherization program, for help lowering her energy bills, and in a Healthy Home visit, to see if anything could be done that might help with her family’s asthma. She completed the application for the Healthy Home visit, which would schedule her with the OC’s in-home educator trained in conservation education and healthy-home environmental assessment.

The initial education and assessment visit identified several opportunities to improve the indoor environment in Ms. Jones’s house. Later, the OC educator noted high humidity, possible mold staining the bathroom, a leaky roof, incomplete ground cover, old carpet in the bedrooms and living room, and evidence of mice and pesticides in the kitchen and pantry areas.

The OC educator worked with the OC’s weatherization/home repair project coordinator and Ms. Jones to complete the improvements. The OC used home repair funding to repair the roof and weatherization funding to upgrade the ventilation in the bathroom. Weatherization funding was used to complete the ground cover, improve the insulation over the bedrooms, and conduct combustion safety testing of the old and inefficient heating system. The system failed the test and was upgraded using Sustainable Energy Resources for Consumers (SERC) funding. (For more on the SERC program, see “DOE’s WAP: Two New Programs Push the Envelope,” HE Sept/Oct ’11, p. 28.) The crew completed pest exclusion (by plugging holes with copper wool embedded in foam) at the same time as they air sealed the crawl space.

The OC’s privately funded Healthy Homes program changed out the old carpet in two rooms to hard-surfaced, easily cleanable flooring and also provided a HEPA vacuum for the new area rugs. The Healthy Homes funding paid for a green cleaning kit that uses nontoxic cleaning products, walk-off mats at the entryways to minimize dust coming into the house, and dust mite-resistant mattress and pillow covers. The educator and Ms. Jones worked together—the educator gave Ms. Jones a digital humidity gauge to monitor the humidity levels in the house, and she learned the benefit of opening the windows when the indoor humidity rises above 60% in the winter. She also learned the importance of exhausting moisture out of the house and agreed to use her bathroom fan for at least 40 minutes after every shower.

This partnership of funding sources and programs worked. Ms. Jones anticipates lower energy bills, and she and her daughter feel good about the improvements made to their home. From what we know, the work has also reduced conditions known to aggravate asthma symptoms.

WAP and Healthy Homes
WAP providers may be wary of healthy-homes programs, especially since so many health and safety components are taken into account in the course of regular weatherization services. These include, but are not limited to, combustion appliance safety and CO abatement, replacement of unvented space heaters with vented ones, lead-safe work practices, moisture control measures, building tightness assessments, and installation of exhaust fans and added ventilation when necessary. However, with effective partnerships and smart strategizing, WAP and healthy-homes practitioners can work together to achieve the dual goals of health and energy efficiency in the most cost-effective and efficient way possible.

The healthy-homes movement is a comprehensive approach to combating disease and injury in the home. The federal agencies involved include the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, EPA, and now DOE. The Coalition to End Childhood Lead Poisoning, through its Green & Healthy Homes Initiative™, has initiated community-based, healthy housing intervention programs to test and evaluate combining energy efficiency and healthy homes. The National Center on Healthy Housing, through its National Healthy Homes Training Center, provides evidence-based training and technical assistance, as well as evaluation and hands-on guidance in this field. Scientific evidence links substandard housing to poor health—a finding that has helped to drive the creation of these projects (see “Integrating Energy Efficiency and Healthy Homes,” HE July/Aug ’11, p. 38).

Healthy homes providers take a holistic approach to the coordinated mitigation of housing-related hazards, rather than addressing them one at a time. Drawing from the experience of healthy-homes programs, the Weatherization Plus Health program is developing means to integrate the seven principles of healthy homes into the WAP process. WAP providers will ultimately be able to use a system of referring clients to agencies and programs that may be able to address their health and safety problems better. Services are intended to be coordinated so that the homes can be weatherized properly and safely. The seven principles are as follows:

Keep It Contaminant-Free. Many contaminants pose health threats. The most common of these contaminants are listed below.

  • Lead and lead-based paint can cause learning difficulties and neurological problems. While WAP adheres to the EPA Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) rule and follows strict lead-safe weatherization work practices, it has little money to spend on lead abatement. Healthy-homes projects can often perform more-extensive remediation measures, such as replacing windows that have lead-painted frames.
  • Environmental tobacco smoke can cause lung cancer, heart problems, and sudden infant death syndrome. Healthy-homes programs often educate clients on ways to stop smoking.
  • Radon can cause lung cancer. In homes where radon may be present, precautions should be taken, based on the EPA Healthy Indoor Environment Protocols for Home Energy Upgrades, to reduce the health hazards posed by the presence of radon. WAP crews install ground vapor barriers tight to the foundation perimeter where site conditions permit, and are allowed to test for radon in locations where it is likely to be present. While WAP doesn’t usually allow weatherization professionals to perform remediation, the latest DOE guidelines allow remediation where weatherization work is known to have worsened radon levels and when those levels are above the EPA action level of 4 picocuries per liter (4 pCi/l). The remediation work in those cases would probably involve venting the radon away from the house.
  • Asbestos can cause cancer, specifically mesothelioma, a rare cancer that occurs in the thin layer of tissue that covers the viscera. Energy upgrades can disturb asbestos. Updated DOE WAP health and safety procedures address work on homes with asbestos siding, asbestos pipe insulation, and suspected vermiculite or asbestos in attic insulation. Partnerships with healthy-homes programs can help to remediate situations that may be beyond WAP’s capability to address.
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can cause asthma, allergies, and headaches. To control VOCs, technicians must control the source. This can be done by using no- or low-VOC products, sealing containers of VOC products and storing them away from air intakes, removing unwanted VOC products, ventilating the home properly, and ensuring adequate air sealing between the garage and the home.
  • Carbon monoxide can cause headaches, fatigue, and even death. Unvented space heaters should be removed and combustion appliances should be properly tested for spillage, draft, and CO.

Keep It Pest-Free. Pests can trigger or cause asthma and allergies, transmit disease, bite, contaminate food, and lead people to overreact and ignore the directions on pesticide labels. Pesticides also pose many risks. They can cause eye, nose, and throat irritation; skin rashes; stomach cramps; and nausea. They can damage the kidneys and the central nervous system, and they can increase the risk of certain cancers. The principles of integrated pest management (IPM) include keeping pests out to begin with, eliminating hiding spots by changing the landscape, storing and disposing of food properly, keeping the kitchen clean, and killing the existing population using traps and appropriate pesticides. Often pests can be prevented from entering the home under the WAP air-sealing measure by blocking holes with wire mesh or concrete before caulking or foaming. (To learn more about IPM, see “Integrated Pest Management in the Home,” HE, Nov/Dec ’04, p. 36.)

Keep It Clean. Clean homes help reduce pest infestations and exposure to contaminants. Strategies for keeping homes clean include installing hard-surface flooring, which is easy to clean, and educating the client on proper and effective cleaning methods and products.

Keep It Dry. Moisture on household surfaces can lead to mold growth, and mold in a home can cause many health problems, such as upper respiratory tract symptoms, including coughing, wheezing, asthma, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Sources of moisture are poorly managed rainwater or groundwater, plumbing leaks, household sources such as cooking, and condensation of moisture-laden air on cold surfaces. WAP typically installs ground vapor barriers and can address some drainage problems—for example, by installing gutters and downspouts to divert water away from the foundation. Healthy-homes programs may address severe mold and moisture problems that WAP cannot mitigate.

Keep It Well Ventilated. Increasing the fresh-air supply in a home can improve respiratory health. This can be achieved through whole-house ventilation strategies and assessment of existing fans and exhaust. The implementation of ASHRAE 62.2-2010 will further ensure proper home ventilation in WAP and in the home performance industry at large.

Keep It Safe. Most injuries to children occur in the home. Falls are the most frequent cause, followed by injuries from objects in the home, such as cuts or scrapes from sharp corners, sharp objects, burns, and poisonings. Prevention strategies include installing grab bars, adequate lighting, and handrails; removing trip hazards; repairing stair treads; and completing minor repairs.

Keep It Well Maintained. Poorly maintained homes are at risk for contaminants, moisture, and pest problems. Deteriorated lead-based paint in older housing is the primary cause of lead poisoning, which affects some 240,000 U.S. children per year. WAP professionals frequently see poorly maintained heating systems, with all the associated problems. Client education on the importance of maintenance is the primary strategy for keeping homes safe.

Helping Collaboration Happen
Healthy-homes programs following the seven principles exist throughout the nation in a loose confederation. Funded through a variety of federal, state, and local sources, these programs vary widely in scope and focus due to regional needs. Locating a provider of a particular service and navigating the web of nonprofits and other entities providing those services can be challenging. This is where the Weatherization Plus Health initiative steps in.

The connection between WAP and healthy homes is clear: WAP already enters hundreds of thousands of low-income homes every year, has a component to address health and safety and a willingness to expand these services, and is a partner with the Community Services Block Grant. This federal antipoverty block grant provides core funding to local agencies to reduce poverty, revitalize low-income communities, and empower low-income families to become self-sufficient. In so doing, it provides a groundwork for leveraging additional resources and funding.

Using the principles of healthy homes, Weatherization Plus Health seeks to connect WAP and healthy-homes providers in an effort to ensure that low-income homes are best served with comprehensive services to address their energy efficiency, as well as residents’ health and safety needs. To do so, NASCSP is creating a number of resources and providing extensive training to facilitate ongoing communication and cooperation between the providers of these complementary services.

A major goal of the project is to identify existing partnerships and then learn how those partnerships can be expanded to serve every county in the nation. NASCSP will produce reports for each state and territory that detail the existing WAP and healthy-homes infrastructure, highlight successful partnerships, and identify possible pathways to future collaboration. These reports will also show where increased cooperation between agencies and providers could improve the provision of services to needy families.

In tandem with the state reports, NASCSP is creating a publicly accessible web site that will map healthy homes and WAP providers nationwide. This interactive application will be available to the general public and will show simply and easily where and how one can get assistance for any particular health, safety, or energy efficiency issue within a specified area.

Training and technical assistance are critical components of Weatherization Plus Health. To that end, NASCSP offers training through conferences, webinars, or other means, to facilitate partnerships and to disseminate best practices throughout the network. These best-practice models and resources will be available publicly online and will detail models of collaboration and proven successes.

In 2011, NASCSP and DOE convened six regional conferences to bring together WAP and healthy-homes providers, identify gaps between existing partnerships, and encourage new opportunities for partnerships. Targeted participants were any interested parties who worked in the fields of energy efficiency or health and safety. They included state directors of WAP, state and local WAP staff, state public health officials, state associations and community action partnerships, Community Services Block Grant staff, community action associations, healthy-homes practitioners, local health departments, health professionals, researchers and advocates focusing on energy efficiency or healthy-homes issues, and housing and community development agencies. These conferences were successful and will be followed up with six additional conferences in 2012 that will track and expand upon the work done at the previous conferences and in the intervening months.

Weatherization Plus Health promises to deliver important resources to the WAP and healthy-homes networks, and to improve housing nationwide. We know that weatherization works to reduce energy usage for low-income consumers. By combining weatherization and healthy homes, the Weatherization Plus Health initiative will work to reduce energy bills while improving the home environment. This will result in healthier homes, healthier families, and ultimately, a healthier nation.

Read the original from Home Energy Magazine at homeenergy.org


Posted by: Rebecca Stewart at 10:57 AM
 | permalink



Weatherization Degree at Montana State University



Tuesday, March 06, 2012
The Montana Board of Regents has approved the offering of the Montana Weatherization Training Center's one-year degree, noted as the "Certificate of Applied Science in Residential Building Performance."  

The 33 credit degree is comprised of DOE Weatherization Standardized Curriculum courses, on-line courses as well as optional/elective credits for internships and special emphasis content dealing with weatherization.   While the degree will be offered by Montana State University (taught at the MT Wx Training Center), for national student access, IREC accredited and partner (with MSU and the MT Wx Training Center) Weatherization Training Centers throughout the United States will also be able to offer core degree courses and internship credit to students at their center. 

The degree is anticipated to be offered in the fall of 2012.

For more information, visit the Montana Weatherization Training Center website at http://www.weatherization.org/

Posted by: Alice Gaston at 9:53 AM
 | permalink



President Obama's FY'13 budget request



Thursday, February 16, 2012
Monday, February 13th, the Obama Administration submitted its FY 2013 budget to Congress, asking for $139 million dollars for WAP in FY 13. While the figure is not closer to the $175 million regarded as the minimum necessary to sustain a national program, viewed through the prism of the budget cutting frenzy that is underway in Washington, D.C, the cut could have been deeper. All domestic discretionary programs were subject to across the board cuts in the President's budget.

This is a challenging time for discretionary programs like WAP and we will need your help in our fight to sustain it nationwide. WAP has been a highly successful and effective investment in the American workforce and for low-income families nationwide. It is the largest residential energy conservation program in the nation and performs a vital role in reducing the burden of high energy prices on low-income families. The Recovery Act WAP has been a resounding success and has improved the homes and lives of over 600,000 low-income families through the end of 2011, while supporting over 15,000 jobs. These successes have not been adequately communicated in DC.

Our task this year is a challenging one: we face the likelihood of a long term Continuing Resolution which ties WAP funding to the unacceptably low $68M number contained in the Omnibus bill enacted in December. This will make it very difficult for DOE to keep all state programs funded at sustainable levels. But the value delivered by this program will, we believe, ensure that we succeed in securing the long term survival of the WAP program: no other federal program succeeds as WAP does in training and employing thousands of workers in green-collar jobs that cannot be exported; in saving low-income families money by cutting down on energy bills; and in reducing our dependence on foreign oil. WAP has met the challenge in the past and we will do so in the future. 

Posted by: Brad Penney at 10:26 AM
 | permalink



WAP Ranked 2nd in Recovery Act Jobs in 4Q2011



Wednesday, February 01, 2012
The Weatherization Assistance Program moved up to 2nd out of approximately 200 federal programs in the number of direct jobs created or retained, at 13,186 for the fourth quarter beginning October 1 and ending December 31, 2011. You can see the rankings by clicking here.  Since the first quarter 2010, WAP has been ranked in the top 10 in the number of ARRA jobs created, a clear indication that Weatherization Works!

WAP not only creates jobs but has met the goals of the Recovery Act three months early. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu recently highlighted this exceptional achivement with a press release congratulating the Network for weatherizing 600,000 homes ahead of schedule. You can read the press release here. This story is underscored on the recovery.gov homepage, the main repository for all Recovery Act grant information. You can read the positive WAP story here.

With the tough legislative season ahead, it is critical that we share successful stories like these with our Networks and Congressional delegations to highlight the successes of WAP during ARRA and beyond. An easy way to get the word out is to tweet the message below on your Twitter account: 

#Weatherization ranked 2nd out of 200 #RecoveryAct programs for jobs created in 4Q2011. Spread the word, Weatherization Works! 

Blog posts, messages to Congressional delegations, and newspaper articles about your own programs are all ways to get out the message that Weatherization works and should continue in these tough economic times.

For more ideas about Public Information strategies for WAP, please visit the Public Information Campaign section on waptac.org here: http://waptac.org/Public-Information.aspx
 
Thanks for all that you do to ensure the success of the ARRA WAP!

Posted by: Alice Gaston at 11:08 AM
 | permalink



GAO Releases Study that WAP On Track



Thursday, January 12, 2012
The challenge by the President was steep: weatherize over 600,000 homes across the nation in three years. Difficulties in meeting this goal abounded from Davis-Bacon wages to Historic Preservation requirements, from new reporting obligations to training qualified workers. After only two and half years, however, the Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) is on target to exceed its goals, confirmed in a new report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Published in December 2011, the report found WAP on track to meet and to exceed the goals set by the Obama Administration under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act).

Often termed the “Congressional watchdog,” GAO is an independent, nonpartisan agency that, on behalf of Congress, investigates how effectively and responsibly government funds are spent. Despite a number of unflattering hearings in Congress about WAP in the last year, the GAO’s long-term study of the Recovery Act WAP concluded definitively:  WAP is on target to meet the production goals of the Recovery Act.

The report, titled “Progress and Challenges in Spending Weatherization Funds,”  had four main objectives, to: “examine (1) the status and use of weatherization grant program funds under the Recovery Act; (2) the challenges, if any, that recipients faced in implementing the weatherization program under the Recovery Act; (3) the extent to which the weatherization program under the Recovery Act has achieved its energy and cost savings goals; and (4) the changes, if any, over time in the quality of the FTE data reported by Recovery Act recipients (state-level agencies), particularly by weatherization program recipients.”

The agency polled all 58 Grantees of the Recovery Act funding and interviewed stakeholders including officials from the Department of Energy (DOE), national associations focused on low income housing, and 10 state and territorial offices charged with overseeing WAP. Conclusions from the report are largely in line with experiences states and agencies have expressed about the Recovery Act: Davis-Bacon and Historic Preservation requirements slowed the implementation of the program, leading to low expenditures in the first year, but the Program picked up steam considerably in the second and third years. The GAO provided no new recommendations for the program and was overall positive about the achievements of WAP and the work done by States and agencies.

DOE publicized this positive report from the GAO with an announcement by DOE Secretary Chu in December, stating that WAP met its Recovery Act production goals three months early. "Today the Department of Energy marks a major milestone: we have weatherized more than 600,000 low-income homes and put thousands of people to work through the Recovery Act," said Secretary Chu. "Across America, DOE's successful Weatherization Assistance Program has increased the demand for energy-saving products and services, created thousands of skilled jobs, and helped families to reduce energy waste and save money."

The bottom line: WAP has not only met but exceeds the goals of the Recovery Act with the proof to back it up. These are reports and press releases that the Network should be proud of and use in Public Information Campaigns when talking about the program. After negative Inspector General reports and scores of bad stories in the press, WAP is finally getting the recognition for the hard work done across the nation to help low-income families live in safer, healthier, more energy efficient housing. 

Posted by: Alice Gaston at 2:21 PM
 | permalink






null